集藏与通联：亚洲建筑档案中心系列国际会议

（二）

COLLECT AND CONNECT: AAAC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES II

坚实人本基础上的探索：现代建筑的人类学研究国际研讨会

International Symposium On Solid Human Foundations: Anthropologies of Modern Architecture

演讲者及演讲内容简介

Introduction of Speakers and Their Lectures

爱德华·福特

Edward Ford

弗吉尼亚大学荣休教授

《当代建筑细部》和《建筑细部》的作者

Professor Emeritus, University of Virginia

Renowned author of The Details of Modern Architecture, and The Architectural Detail

题目 / Title

窗的发明

The Invention of the Window

摘要 / Abstract

窗是必要的吗？“亲生命性”运动提出一种略显简化的主张：窗的存在并非出于审美欲望，而是生理必需，是维系人类身心健康的必要条件。这种观点也认为，人类在自然界进化的过程中，与自然产生联结的本能已融入基因。人类学则给出一种更复杂的答案。在与自然紧密接触的社会（如美洲原住民）的居所中，带有景观视野的“画框式”窗户几乎不存在。为何如此？菲利普·德斯科拉区分了“共生社会”和“自然社会”。以欧洲为代表的自然社会建构了“自然”这一实体，并将人类归于它的对立面——“文化”。而共生社会（如美洲原住民）则并不做出这种区分；在他们的世界观中，自然及其中的生灵是不可分割的。历史表明：窗户，特别是那种用来观看自然的窗户，恰恰是这种“自然”与“文化”的区分带来的产物。它是一种较晚近的发明，是我们在离开自然世界之后，为了回望那个世界而创造的事物。

Are windows necessary? The Biophilia movement maintains, somewhat simplistically, that the window is not the product of aesthetic desire but of physiological necessity, required for our physical and mental well-being, and argues that our species has evolved in the natural world and is genetically encoded to engage with nature. A more complex answer is provided by anthropology. In the dwellings of societies that live close to nature, such as Native Americans, the picture window, the one with a view, is almost unknown. Why? Phillipe Descola makes a distinction between Animistic and Naturalistic societies. Naturalistic societies, European ones, have invented an entity, “nature”, and humans belong to nature’s opposite, culture. Animistic societies, such as Native Americans, make no such division. Nature and its inhabitants cannot be subdivided. History suggests rather that the window, the one that provides a view of nature is a product of this division. It is a more recent invention, something we invented to look back into the natural world we have left.

塚本由晴

Yoshiharu Tsukamoto

犬吠工作室创始人

东京科学大学教授

Founder of Atelier Bow-Wow

Professor, Institute of Science Tokyo

题目 / Title

发生于“之间”的行为

Behavior Emerges In-Between

摘要 / Abstract

当行动者遇到某种特定结构时，他们之间的互动便会产生行为。这种结构不仅是物理意义上的，也是事物网络的关系性结构。如今的城市生活方式完全依赖于工业化的服务，食物、能源和住房，这种模式消耗了地球资源。当下，我们应当学习人类学中的“物的网络”，并试图让民主制度和资本主义脱钩，从而以新的模式获取本地资源。其中，设计智慧正经历一场关键转变——从以空间为中心迈向以网络为导向的思维方式。

When actors encounter the certain structure, behavior emerges between them. This structure is not only physical but relational of the network of things. Today’s urban life style is totally depended on the industrial services where food, energy and house are only accessible by paying money, and can’t stop the exploitation of the planet. It is time to reimagine the accessibility to local resources by learning from ethnographical network of things and decoupling the democracy and capitalism. Thus, design intelligence is now critically shifting from space oriented into network oriented.

何健翔

HE Jianxiang

源计划建筑师事务所创始合伙人

香港大学客座副教授

Founding Partner, O-OFFICE Architects

Adjunct Associate Professor, The University of Hong Kong

题目 / Title

一馆、一厂、一校：重织经验的地方

A Museum, a Factory, a School: Reconstituting Places of Experience

摘要 / Abstract

自上世纪80年代起蓬勃发展的珠三角城市带在创造经济奇迹的同时，其剧烈的环境变化和人口流动已彻底改变这个地域原本连续的地理城乡体系，流变的城市和人口引发了一系列问题。在此境况下，源计划以回溯式的观察者与批判性参与者的角色介入地域性的实践，将人与城乡空间，以及环境变迁史之间的关系作为源计划研究的主线，并由此建立一套基于该线索的方法和建构策略。汇报通过选取源计划在珠三角三个建筑作品进一步阐释他们如何通过设计重建人与地方的历史性关联，以抵御平庸范式的无尽扩张，让物和空间以自身的方式述说着一种全新的城乡叙事，并重构以经验交织的地方。

The Pearl River Delta (PRD) region has experienced an economic boom in decades, while its drastic environmental changes and population mobility have completely disintegrated its once-coherent geographical urban-rural organism. Changing cities and population have triggered a complex dilemma of modernity. In response, O-office intervenes in the design practice of the region where they themselves grew up as both retrospective observers and critical participants. They take the evolving relationship between people and urban/rural space as the main thread of their research, on the basis of which they establish their design methodology and tactics. The presentation selects three cases of O-office’s architectural works in the PRD region to illustrate how they reconcile the historical connection between people and place, resist the unrelenting spread of the mediocre paradigm, allow material and spatial realities to articulate their own alternative urban and rural narratives, and reweave places with the texture of lived experience.

黑石泉

Izumi Kuroishi（黒石いずみ）

福岛学院大学教授

Professor, Fukushima Gakuin University

题目 / Title

现代日本对以人为中心的空间和建筑人类学的探索

Search for Human-Centered Space and Architectural Anthropology in ModernJapan

摘要 / Abstract

自20世纪初至战后时期，日本的建筑与城市设计积极采用西方模式，来实现社会制度和身体实践的现代化。然而，这一进程却加剧了城市与建筑与日常生活的断裂。对此，边缘性思潮始终试图超越舶来理念的制约，重新审视空间的意义。早在20世纪20年代，日本建筑师便以身体经验为基础，重新定义空间的概念。这一研究路径深受拉斯金、齐美尔、博厄斯等思想家的影响，并最早体现在今和次郎的作品中。他对日常生活的描述性观察兼具人类学特质和触觉感知，奠定了新的建筑思想范式。战后如宫脇檀、元仓真琴等学者发展了这一研究路径，通过对街巷、日常技艺和社群关系的详细研究，他们试图超越单一的地域主义立场，重构以人为中心的环境。本研究将考察这些研究背后的理论基础，尤其是与伯纳德·鲁道夫斯基在日本展开的研究，旨在梳理“日常性”、“身体性”和“关系性”等概念，阐明它们如何持续挑战日本现代建筑话语中的主流叙事。

From the early 20th century through the postwar era, Japanese architectural and urban design actively adopted Western models to modernize social systems and bodily practices. However, this led to a widening gap with everyday life. In response, peripheral movements consistently reexamined the meaning of space beyond imported ideals. From the 1920s, Japanese architects had already begun deeper inquiries redefining spatial concepts through embodied experience. This perspective, shaped by thinkers like Ruskin, Simmel, and Boas, found early expression in the work of Wajiro Kon, whose descriptive observation of everyday life grounded a distinctly anthropological and tactile mode of architectural thought. Postwar figures such as Mayumi Miyawaki and Makoto Motokura extended this approach through detailed studies of alleys, daily techniques, and communal relations, aiming to restore human-centered environments beyond mere regionalism. This study explores the theoretical grounding of these inquiries, particularly in dialogue with Bernard Rudofsky’s Japan-based research, to trace how concepts of everydayness, embodiment, and relationality consistently challenged the dominant narratives within Japanese modern architectural discourse.

迈克尔·阿斯加德·安德森

Michael Asgaard Andersen

丹麦皇家艺术学院副教授

Associate Professor, Royal Danish Academy

题目 / Title

斯蒂恩·艾勒·拉斯姆森所认识的中国：一段成长的旅程

Steen EilerRasmussen’s China: A Formative Journey

摘要 / Abstract

讲座将探讨斯滕·艾勒·拉斯姆森1923年的中国之行，作为一段对成长有重要影响的经历，它从根本上塑造了其对建筑学的研究方法。通过对拉斯姆森的速写、文字和照片的分析，研究揭示了他在中国建筑传统中六个月的浸润如何影响了他后来的理论协作，包括《城镇与建筑》（1951年）和《建筑体验》（1959年）。

研究表明，拉斯姆森对中国城市规划、色彩等级制度与材料观念的接触，逐渐加深他对建筑的空间体验和感官维度上的理解。他的跨文化观察视角成为一种“陌生化”的研究方式，使他得以区分建筑的特定文化表达与人类的普遍需求。

通过剖析中国建筑传统对西方空间固有思维的挑战，本研究将揭示现代建筑中被忽视的视角，并以此回应此次会议的主题。拉斯姆森的沉浸式观察方法为当代建筑实践提供了一个重要范例，展示了建筑师在日益全球化的世界中，如何在尊重文化特性的同时，创造出满足基本人类需求的环境。

This paper examines Steen Eiler Rasmussen’s 1923 journey to China as a formative experience that fundamentally shaped his approach to architecture. Through analysis of Rasmussen’s sketches, writings, and photographs, the study reveals how his six-month immersion in Chinese architectural traditions informed his later theoretical work, including Towns and Buildings (1951) and Experiencing Architecture (1959).

The research demonstrates how Rasmussen’s encounters with Chinese urban planning, chromatic hierarchies, and material philosophies enabled him to develop a deeper understanding of spatial experience and sensory dimensions of architecture. His cross-cultural observations served as a defamiliarization technique that allowed him to distinguish between architecture’s culturally specific expressions and universal human needs.

By examining how Chinese architectural traditions challenged Western spatial assumptions, this study contributes to the symposium’s call to uncover overlooked perspectives in modern architecture. Rasmussen’s method of immersive observation offers a valuable model for contemporary practice, demonstrating how architects can create environments that address fundamental human needs while respecting cultural specificity in an increasingly globalized world.

戴维·莱瑟巴罗

题目 / Title

社群的手势

Gestures of Community

摘要 / Abstract

尽管约瑟夫·里克沃特深入考察了维特鲁威关于建造“原始”棚屋的描述，但正因如此，他反而略过本次简短演讲将聚焦的话题：在这位理论家的“神话”所描述的建筑艺术诞生之初、口头语言萌芽之时、以及人类社群随之孕育的年代，手势在其中所扮演的角色。当代人类学家认为，指向性手势源于三种动机：请求、告知与分享。其中，“展示性分享”不仅对公共领域的建构至关重要，也是构建交流性建筑的基础。为了保持结构的完整性，凡欲安然屹立其所且在墙内庇护人类生活秩序的建筑，都要具备垂直承重的能力。而优秀的建筑则会将这种承重方式以富有表现力的方式呈现出来，以同样方式呈现的还有其他形式的融合性取向，如建筑与其都市环境之间的交织关系——一种社群形成过程中不可或缺的要素。本次演讲所探讨的案例是位于内蒙古呼和浩特的一处新建的村民中心，由张鹏举设计，于2023年8月落成。

Joseph Rykwert’s close attention to Vitruvius’ account of constructing the “primitive” hut led him to bypass the topic on which this short talk will focus: the role that gesture played in the early days of the art of building, the same days when spoken language was first developed, and with it human community—as narrated in the theorist’s myth. Contemporary anthropologists argue that three motives prompt pointing gestures: requesting, informing, and sharing. Showing sharing is essential in the construction of the public realm; also, the construction of communicative buildings. The need for structural integrity requires vertical bearing in every building that intends to hold its ground while sheltering the patterns of human life within its walls. Better buildings make an expressive show of bearings thus taken, as well as other forms of integrative orientation, such as the involvements of the work in its urban surroundings, involvements that are necessary in the formation of communities. The case explored in the talk is a new Community Center in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, designed by Zhang Pengju, and finished in August, 2023.

胡安·曼努埃尔·埃雷迪亚

Juan Manuel Heredia

波特兰州立大学建筑学院教授、院长

Professor and Director of School of Architecture, Portland State University

题目 / Title

“聚集祈祷之海的沙粒”：阿尔贝托·克鲁兹的洛什·帕哈里托斯小教堂

“Assembling the Sand of the Sea of Prayer”: Alberto Cruz’sLos PajaritosChapel

摘要 / Abstract

1952年，阿尔贝托·克鲁兹·科瓦鲁维亚斯受聘于智利瓦尔帕莱索天主教大学建筑学院。作为一名年轻且充满活力的教师，他迅速着手对学院进行改革，组建了一支跨学科教师团队，致力于探索建筑与诗歌、艺术及科学之间的联系。二十年后，他们的成果汇聚为“开放城市”的创作，这是一个由师生共同参与设计并建造的合作项目，其创作动力源自“诗意行为”。学校教学法的源头可追溯至洛什·帕哈里托斯小教堂方案——一个由克鲁兹设计但未建成的项目。通过文本形式发表后，它已成为瓦尔帕莱索大学及智利其他建筑院校的必读文献。本次演讲不仅将阐明让“瓦尔帕莱索学派”和“开放城市”享誉国际的特点，也会揭示它们对现代建筑的潜力和局限的关注。

In 1952 Alberto Cruz Covarrubias was hired by the School of Architecture of the Catholic University of Valparaíso. A young and energetic teacher, he soon began a transformation of the school by forming an interdisciplinary faculty that explored architecture’s relation to poetry, art, and science. Twenty years later, their efforts coalesced in the creation of the “Open City,” a collaborative project where faculty and students design/build prompted by “poetic acts.” At the origin of the school’s pedagogy lies Los Pajaritos chapel, an unexecuted project by Cruz that —published in the form of a text— became required reading in Valparaiso and other architecture schools in Chile. This presentation will revisit this project and text. Here, one not only finds the traits that made the “Valparaiso School” and the “Open City” internationally renowned, but also a precocious anthropological focus on the potentials and limitations of modern architecture that has been until now insufficiently appreciated.

马可·德诺西欧

Marco Trisciuoglio

都灵理工大学教授

东南大学建筑教授

Professor, Politecnico di Torino

Architecture Internationalization Demonstration School of Southeast University

题目 / Title

作为一种想象中文化结构的庭院住宅-轨迹

The Courtyard House as an Anthropological Structure of the Imaginary. Trajectories

摘要 / Abstract

1962至1964年间，意大利建筑师马可·扎努索在撒丁岛设计并建造了一座15mx15m的花岗岩小屋，由两名民工协助完成。房屋围绕一个方形院落布局，堪称原始庭院住宅的原型。

法国人类学家吉尔贝·迪朗（1921-2012）揭示了想象与理性的深刻关联。他在《想象物的人类学结构》（于1960年出版）中提出的研究方法，为后世学者提供了重要的方法论工具，不仅用于研究神话和符号，还用于探索由原型构成的广阔的想象疆域，这些原型在很大程度上解释了人类与环境的关系。在这种思考与关注的框架下，将庭院住宅视为原型主题进行探讨颇具价值，其人类学编纂可追溯至迈锡尼时期古老陶土模型中的“正厅”，即户外的火塘空间与室内的居住空间。

庞贝古城的住宅，即使在公元一世纪下半叶经历了从单一中庭到增设第二个柱廊、花园中庭的转型，但其类型学演变适应的动态过程，仍可与中国四合院随居住者家庭历史相关的潜在发展相比较。在南京的历史城市肌理中，三进院宅的类型十分普遍，甚至在非正式的简陋住所聚居区也被复制，这进一步证明了院宅本身的原型地位。

In the years 1962-1964, the Italian architect Marco Zanuso designed and built a small granite house measuring 15x15 in Sardinia, with the help of two peasant laborers. It was organized around a square courtyard and is the archetype of the primordial courtyard house.

We owe to the French anthropologist Gilbert Durand (1921-2012) the reflection on the strong relationship between the imaginary and reason. His inquiry into The Anthropological Structures of the Imaginary (the title of the book published in 1960) provided subsequent generations of scholars with important methodological tools to study not only myths and symbols but also a vast geography of the imaginary, populated by archetypes that largely explain human relationships with the environment.

Within this framework of reflections and interests, it can be useful to contemplate the theme of the courtyard house as an archetypal theme, starting from its anthropological codification in the Mycenaean megaron of archaic terracotta models: the outdoor space of the fire and the covered space of the dwelling.

The domus of Pompeii, even in its transformation (which occurred in the second half of the first century) from a simple atrium house to one enriched with a second peristyle/garden atrium, in its dynamics of typological transformation/adaptation, can be compared with the Chinese courtyard house (siheyuan) in its potential developments related to the family history of its inhabitants. In the historical urban fabrics of Nanjing, the three-courtyard house is predominant, even replicated in informal shack settlements, further demonstrating the archetypal status of the courtyard house in itself.

题目 / Title

大理为基：把握永恒与流变

Dali as Ground: Navigating Permanence and Flux

摘要 / Abstract

建筑师赵扬于2012年在云南大理开始了他的实践。在过去的十三年间，通过一系列实验性的项目，事务所持续地重新审视了这一有意选定的“环境”。建筑师必须去辨识哪些是相对恒常之物，哪些又在快速变迁。也许，建筑的任务正在于把握永恒与流变之间的动态关系。也正是在这个持续的认知过程中，建筑师的特定方法或态度将逐渐成型。

In 2012, architect Zhaoyang established his practice in Dali, Yunnan Province. Over the past 13 years, this deliberately chosen “context” has been continually re-examined through a series of experimental projects. The architect is compelled to discern what remains relatively constant and what changes rapidly. Perhaps the task of architectures lies in navigating this dynamic between permanence and transformation. And it is within this ongoing process of adaptation that a certain method or attitude may gradually begin to take shape.

白鎭

Jin Baek

首尔国立大学教授

Professor, Seoul National University

题目 / Title

人际互动与风土：建筑与城市的人类学基础

The Inter-personal and the Climatic: An Anthropological Foundation for Architecture and the City

摘要 / Abstract

讲座从人的关联性角度出发，重新思考建筑和城市主义的基础。风土并非无声的背景，而是一种渗入个体的能动力量。在这种理解中，“人”被界定为一种“外向存在”，即在他者之中展开自我。因此，风土成为一种关联性的媒介——个体在面对气候条件时展现的天赋缺陷与能力不足会通过人与人之间的相互协作得到弥补。讲座探讨了建筑与城市空间如何在不同风土的作用下，形成关联性的具化产物。例如，季风气候下传统日本房屋展现出的显著开放性，以及沙漠住宅中相互嵌套和自我消隐的形式。这些迥异的应对方式揭示了由不同风土塑造的多样化的关联性形式，同时揭示的还有它们的作用范围以及融合的可能性。

This paper rethinks the foundation of architecture and urbanism through human solidarity. Drawing on Tetsuro Watsuji’s concept of fudo (climate), it challenges the latent individualism in notions like anthrōpos or homo, emphasizing instead the inter-personal. Climate is understood not as a mute background but as an active force penetrating individuals. Man is defined as the being of ex-sistere, or “to be out among other ‘I’s.” Climate is thus a medium of solidarity through which deficiency and insufficiency of an individual being in coping with the climatic conditions is complemented. The paper explores how architectural and urban spaces are the embodied result of solidarity in relation to different climates—for example, the dramatic openness of traditional Japanese houses in monsoon climates, and the interlocked, self-effacing forms of desert housing. These contrasting responses reveal diverse forms of solidarity shaped by climate, their limits, and possibilities for synthesis.

艾丝拉·萨赫欣·布拉特

Esra Şahin Burat

东南大学建筑副教授

亚洲建筑档案中心副馆长

Associate Professor, Architecture Internationalization Demonstration School, Southeast University

Associate Director, Asian Architectural Archive Center

题目 / Title

面部、身高与张开的手：论空间思维的人类学根源

The Face, the Height, and the Open Hand: On theAnthropological Roots of Spatial Thinking

摘要 / Abstract

在现存最早的建筑学文本中，维特鲁威描述了关于人体各部分之间的比例关系，并广为流传。他还补充道，作为一个整体的人体在完全伸展时可以同时勾勒出圆形与方形的轮廓。尽管“内部比例”与“整体形态”这两个概念在后世的理解中多被视为彼此独立，并且仅在视觉层面被理解，但在这部古老文本的表层之下，实则潜藏着更为深邃且相互交织的历史脉络。本研究探讨二种人体形式——部分与整体，是如何在最早的集体建造行为及早期定居生活的建筑中得以展现的，从而揭示建筑的经济、生态、社群和宇宙观的基础。研究追溯了这些观念在不同传统中的延续与演变，并考察了现代建筑师试图复兴这些理念的努力。通过将朝向、献祭与更新作为空间延展的人类学原型，研究认为，这些原型若想在能够激发回应的建筑场域中得以实现，依赖于一种独特的人类能力——设计思维。这种思维兼具认知性与想象力、感性与理性、身体性与互动性的多重特质。

In the earliest surviving text on architecture, Vitruvius famously described the proportional relationships among the parts of the human body. Taken as a whole, he added, an extended body could yield both circular and square outlines. While these two notions—internal proportions and total bodily form— remained distinct and primarily visual in their reception, a deeper and intertwined history lies beneath the surface of the ancient text. This study explores how the parts and the forms of the body were expressed in the first acts of collective building and the architecture of early settled life, revealing their economic, ecological, communal, and cosmological foundations. It traces their echoes across diverse traditions and examines their attempted revival by modern architects. By foregrounding orientation, offering, and renewal as the anthropological archetypes of spatial extension, the study argues that their realization in resonant architectural settings depends on a distinct human capacity: design thinking—at once cognitive and visionary, sensible and intelligible, corporeal and communicative.

弗代里科·马达罗

Federico Madaro

都灵大学汉语言文学兼职教授

都灵理工大学、清华大学博士研究生

Adjunct Professor of Chinese Language and Literature, Università di Torino

PhD candidate, Politecnico di Torino and Tsinghua University

题目 / Title

林间小径——亚洲建筑档案中心的人类学藏书

Pathways in the Forest: The Anthropological Collection of the AAAC

摘要 / Abstract

演讲将探讨豪尔赫·路易斯·博尔赫斯的《巴别图书馆》的哲学和认识论内涵，以此为隐喻来介绍亚洲建筑档案中心的人类学藏书。演讲反思了在信息过载时代知识检索面临的挑战，并将这一问题与约瑟夫·里克沃特教授精心编藏的图书馆相关联。演讲追溯了人类学在西方和中国语境中的历史发展，并强调了里克沃特在这一领域中所持有的包容性与人文性的视野。这些藏书体现了里克沃特教授的毕生追求：跨越时空与文化的维度来理解人类，进而构建一张知识路径的网络——一片真正的“书的森林”。

Federico Madaro’s presentation explores the philosophical and epistemological implications of Jorge Luis Borges’ Library of Babel, using it as a metaphor to introduce the anthropological collection housed in the AAAC. He reflects on the challenges of knowledge retrieval in an age of information overload and connects this with Professor Joseph Rykwert’s curated library. He traces the historical development of anthropology in both Western and Chinese contexts and highlights Rykwert’s inclusive and humanistic vision of the discipline. The collection exemplifies a lifelong pursuit of understanding humanity across time, space, and culture, forming a network of knowledge pathways—a true “forest of books.”

5月29日上午的工作坊的参与嘉宾包括：戴维·莱瑟巴罗、胡安·曼努埃尔·埃雷迪亚、白鎭、迈克尔·阿斯加德·安德森、黑石泉、艾丝拉·萨赫欣·布拉特、斯南·布拉特、安东尼奥·托迪斯、里卡多·鲁依沃、费德里科·马达罗（马志飞）、朱渊、史永高、葛明、诸葛净、白颖、赵越。

此外，研讨会还特别邀请了人文学院、艺术学院以及校图书馆的相关学者参加，以亚洲建筑档案中心为基点推动东南大学人文社科方向的跨学科交流合作。东南大学其他院系部门的参会者包括：

袁曦临 | 东南大学图书馆研究员

李轶南 | 东南大学艺术学院教授

张娟 | 东南大学人文学院教授、中文系主任

贺宴然 | 东南大学人文学院副教授

陈非儿 | 东南大学人文学院讲师

以及相关学科的博士生。

The participants of the Workshop on the morning of May 29 will include David Leatherbarrow, Juan Manuel Heredia, Jin Baek, Michael Asgaard Andersen, Izumi Kuroishi, Esra Sahin Burat, Sinan Burat, Antonios Thodis, Ricardo Ruivo, Federico Madaro, ZHU Yuan, SHI Yonggao, GE Ming, ZHUGE Jing, BAI Ying, ZHAO Yue.

In addition, the Workshop will bring together scholars from the School of Humanities, the School of Arts and the University Library, in an attempt to foster interdisciplinary collaboration in social sciences and humanities. Participants from other School/Departments of Southeast University include:

YUAN Xilin, Research Fellow of University Library

LI Yinan, Professor at the School of Arts

ZHANG Juan, Professor and Department Chair of Chinese Language and Literature at the School of Humanities

HE Yanran, Associate Professor at the School of Humanities

CHEN Feier, Lecturer at the School of Humanities

and PhD candidates from related disciplines.

了解线上参会注册方法，请点击跳转第一次会议通知。

Please read the first conference announcement for online attendance registration details.